I was born into a farming family. That is not a biographical flourish; it is the reason I think
the way I do. Agricultural households read a landscape as a system — where the water comes from,
which season the seed belongs to, who upstream has to cooperate for anything downstream to work.
You learn early that outcomes are collective and that patience is a technical skill rather than a
virtue. When I later began looking at how countries in this part of the world relate to each
other, the vocabulary already felt familiar. Neighbours share a watershed whether or not they
have signed anything.
For close to two decades I have worked in the national interest on social harmony, youth
engagement and regional cooperation across South Asia, increasingly within the framework of
BIMSTEC — the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation.
None of that work has been conducted from an official position. I hold no government post and I
negotiate on no one's behalf. What I do is convene: assemble institutions that would not
ordinarily share a table, design a shared undertaking, and stay long enough for the relationships
to outlast the event.
It took me some years to understand that convening is itself a discipline. In the beginning I
assumed the substance was the important part and the coordination was administrative overhead.
The opposite turned out to be true. Ideas about regional cooperation are abundant and cheap. What
is scarce is the person willing to spend eleven months persuading a university, a border
authority, a broadcaster, a cultural confederation, three armed services and five state
governments to agree on one calendar — and then to be present at six in the morning when the
contingent actually rolls out.